Cross Sectional Study on Senior Citizens Prospects and Challenges

Written By: SuperAdmin - Jun.26,2023

Presented in an International Forum at ICEMABE 2023 last June 17, 2023 in Kendari, Indonesia; and soon to be included in the International WEBSITE Publication.

Webinar June 17, 2023 4th International Conference on Management, Education, AbriBusiness and Business Entrepreneurship (ICEMABE). Abner Ty of PCU presented a paper on Senior Citizens and Employment; I was his coauthor. Congratulatins, Abner. Honored to coauthor with you. onward to your PhD dissertation at PCU.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

21st Century Perspectives on the Role of Management, Education and Technology in Human Welfare

Written By: SuperAdmin - Jun.26,2023

ABSTRACT

Quantum perspective (1925-2021) in the 21st century is a departure from the modern science view of Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and Isaac Newton (1625-1727) in the 16th -18th century. Newtonian science and Cartesian logic captured the heart and mind of humanity’s pursuit for material wellbeing that led to colonialization and up till now an extensive globalization is taking place. The welfare of humanity described as common good was in the hands of democratic capitalists. The agricultural civilization, industrial civilization, global civilization and digital civilization have served human welfare at the expense of Mother Nature and the socio-economic imbalance continues to exist globally. The ecological civilization of China is a new model for environmental practice toward a socialist spiritual civilization. A quantum perspective on human welfare has been proposed by Martha Beck, Fahri Karakas and Margaret Wheatley that promotes a 21st century human welfare. This paper discusses the impact of quantum mechanics that altered mainstream management to multistream management; it presents an educational background on pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy; and it makes a distinction between digitization and digitalization in technology. Ir looks into the role of business management, educational and digital technology in creating a new world of human welfare.

Keywords Quantum perspective, Cartesian logic, Newtonian science, digitalization, digitilization, mainstream management, and multistream management.

INTRODUCTION

Marinoff (2007) in his book, The Middle Way, cited four ideographs that triggered four great civilizations. These are: Hellenic, Abrahamic, Sinic, and Vedic great ideas that flourished around the world. The onset of Cartesian philosophy triggered a rational approach to human thinking paradigm that was anchored on logic and reason. Rene Descartes was a leading figure in Rational Civilization. Newtonian physics that explained the laws of nature triggered a Scientific Civilization during the colonial period of exploration of natural resources. With abundant resources it propelled us to an Industrial Civilization. This was followed by a Global Civilization in the age of multinational corporations operating worldwide. The Digital Civilization made personal computers available to humanity, which connected us locally and globally. It made business even more prosperous and opened new ways to learn virtually. However, artificial intelligence, according to Harari, doing interface with humans creates a new relationship that makes us Homo Deus. The challenge is how to use AI for the welfare of humanity and not robotize humans. The Digital Civilization will be a contest between humans and machines.

II. OBJECTIVES

This study aims to: 1. Provide an understanding of the role of management, education and technology in human welfare from a quantum mechanics perspective. 2. Present the shift from Cartesian-Newtonian science to the New Science of quantum physics of Beck, Karakas and Wheatley. 3. Show the mainstream/old and multistream/new concepts in management. 4. Discuss educational learning approaches in the use of pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy. 5. Differentiate digitalization and digitization in 21st century.

III. METHODOLOGY

This paper is a qualitative research (Marshall & Rossman, 2011); it is anchored on key documents that provide an understanding of the role of management, education and technology in promoting human welfare in the 21st century. It is heuristic (Moustakas, 1990) because it provides the researchers who are presenters and the webinar audience to discover and learn something for themselves in understanding the influence of quantum mechanics and other current development in the field of management, education and technology. It makes sense of the past experiences in these three disciplines and promotes new paradigms (Smith, 2015; Sela-Smith, 2002; Hudtohan, 2005; Gonzalez, Luz, & Tirol, 1984). The methodology is multi-valuate (Richardson, 2015) because it deals with various disciplines related to management, education and technology. This is an exploratory discourse (Stebbins, 2011) to study, examine, analyze and investigate the need for creativity and innovation in managing issues and challenges in these three sectors promote human welfare in the 21st century.

IV. DISCUSSION

MODERN PHYSICAL SCIENCE OF DESCARTES AND NEWTON

Touted as modern science, Rene Descartes (2006 trans.) philosophical affirm of “I think; therefore, I am” created a new awareness of the power of the human mind. Isaac Newton’s (1846) discovery of the physical laws of nature propelled the exploration of earthly resources during the colonial period of our history. The belief that man has dominion over the whole world was reinforced by the Catholic doctrine on man-centered perspective over God’s creation.

As early as 1925, quantum mechanics studied the scientific laws that describe the unusual behavior of photons, electrons and the other particles that make up. it’s the physics that explains how everything works: the best description we have of the nature of the particles that make up matter and the forces with which they interact. physics underlies how atoms work, and so why chemistry and biology work as they do. In quantum physics it avers that: The mind is the sole governing agency of the body.

Figure 1. Descartes, Newton and Quantum Mechanics

(https://www.facebook.com/Qmechanics/)

Knight (2018) echoes what Einstein said: “The field is the sole governing agency of the particle.” He continues to say that this revelation is huge if we apply it consciously to our life. it means the invisible field of energy, that is within us and all around us, is what creates and sustains matter. We can learn to tap into the field and therefore create our own reality. When each ONE of us is living in such a way, the world will become full of other ONES doing just the same, and the world will become a reflection of the ONEness that we all desire at a soul level. Your soul has come from the invisible field, and has created this ‘particle’ called a body, surely it is the least you can do to return the favor by acknowledging that creation and therefore helping your soul to fulfill its divine mission of realization, to know and be one love.” (Knight, 2016).

Quantum mechanics Is a science that deals with the behavior of matter and light on the atomic and subatomic scale. It attempts to describe the properties of molecules and atoms and their constituents—electrons, protons, neutrons, and other more esoteric particles such as quarks and gluons. These properties include the interactions of the particles with one another and with electromagnetic radiation (https://www.britannica.com/science/quantum-mechanics-physics).

PARADIGM SHIFT

There has been a shift from Newtonian physical science to a New Science of Quantum Physics. I am presenting Martha Beck’s Old World versus New World Perspectives, Fahri Karakas, Old and New Paradigms in organization development, and Margaret Wheatley’s Leadership and the New Science.

Martha Beck

. The spent old world of Beck is Newtonian worldview and the wild new world is the world of quantum mechanics. She contrasts the inner experience of individual, relationships, careers, industries and technology from these two perspectives

Table 1. Old World versus New World Perspectives

Fahri Karakas

Fahri Karakas presents old and new paradigms in organization development (OD). The influence of quantum physics is summarized as follows: traditional organization development models are giving way to new intervention methods and models in an age of uncertainty, complexity, globalization, and accelerating change. Karakas suggests new roles for OD professionals in the 21st century as social artist, ethical pioneer, spiritual visionary, creative catalyst, cultural innovator, holistic thinker, and community builder. (Karakas, 2006). Table 2 shows the old and new paradigms in Organization Development, covering: 1. Old vs. New Science, 2. Profit vs. Multiple Goals, 3, Uniformity vs. Diversity, 4. Command/control vs. Flexibility/empowerment,5. Certainty vs. Uncertainty, 6. Partial vs. Impartial View, 7. Old vs. New Metaphors.

Table 2. Changing Paradigms of Organization Development

Margaret Wheatley

Margaret Wheatley presents a new leadership and the new science of quantum physics. She describes how new developments in the sciences show us how to design a new, more effective organizational structure. The new structure is more responsive to human needs and to our rapidly changing times. Based on this understanding, you need to make our organization more flexible and adaptable

Wheatley explains the need to get rid of our old outdated mechanistic models and adapt our organizations to prosper in the future. Our accepted analytical world view, based on using logical analysis and relying numbers to chart progress, should be replaced. She makes a compelling case and urges organizations to become more effective by becoming more human and natural. getAbstract.com recommends this pivotal book to leaders at all levels. Figure 3 contrasts: 1. Newtonian vs. New Science, 2. Organization as an open vs. closed system, 3. Identity in organizations, 4. Information, 5. Relationship.

Table 3. Newtonian and New Science

Newtonian Machine imagery. Everything in parts.	New Science Holistic.
Materialistic. Use of physical senses.	Relationships are key.
Direct mechanistic forces.	Fields.
Deterministic.	Probabilities.
Never ending search for better methods of objectively measuring and perceiving the world.	Understanding that there is no model for organizational change.

Table 4. Organization as a System

Newtonian Interacts with its environment.	New Science Isolated from its environment.
Receiving new inputs constantly and responding (learning) to cope.	Exists independent of environment.
Interdependent.	Self-sufficient.
Adaptive and flexible.	Does not adapt external influences.
Import energy/export entropy.	Components are unchanging.
Autopoiesis.	Entropy.
Disequilibrium.	Equilibrium.

Life organizes around identity. In organizations, if people are free to make their own decisions, guided by a clear organizational identity for them to reference, the whole system develops greater coherence and strength. The organization is less controlling, but more orderly.

Table 5. Identity in organizations

Newtonian	New Science
No individual decision making	Self-reference
Organizational structure established by authority	Self-organizing
Controlled	Freedom throughout
People are cogs	People are quantum
Rigid structure	Flexible structure

Information is an essential nourishing element for all systems. It is a fundamental yet invisible player in a constantly evolving, dynamic universe. All life uses information to organize itself into form.

Table 6. Information

Newtonian Tangible.	New Science Intangible.
Controllable, stable, and obedient.	Dynamic. Can generate itself.
Must be controlled for stability.	Free flow necessary for new order.
Limited access and generation.	Must be continually generated.
Power.	Nourishment.

We give up predictability and open up to potentials by understanding relationships. What potential becomes reality, depends on the relationships created between multiple elements: People, events, and the moment. None of us exists independent of our relations with others. Neither the system nor the individual is the more important influence of behavior. Each organism in a system maintains a clear sense of its individual identity within a larger network of relationships that help shape its identity.

What potential becomes reality, depends on the relationships created between multiple elements: People, events and the moment. None of us exists independent of our relations with others. Neither the system nor the individual is the more important influence of behavior. Each organism in a system maintains a clear sense of its individual identity within a larger network of relationships that help shape it’s identity. The Web of Relationships in Organizations power, which is the capacity generated by organizational relationships. In developing Relationships, quality not quantity is key. We have to look everywhere in order to assessing our organization’s capacity for healthy relationships.

Table 7. Relationships

Individualism.	Principle of Complementarity.
Competition.	Uncertainty Principle.
Critical Mass.	Critical Connections.
Objectivity.	Enactment.

Conclusion: New Leadership Role

Leaders should: 1. Help develop a clear identity that lights the dark in moments of confusion.

2. Support employees as they learn to incorporate values into their organizational lives.

3. Understand we are controlled by concepts that invite our participation, not policies and procedures that curtail our contribution.

4. Create space where people, ideas, and information circulate freely.

MAINSTREAM vs. MULTISTREAM MANAGEMENT

The implication of quantum physics in management today on management. According to Kaplan (2014) “Management is directing and controlling a group of people or an organization to reach a goal. Management often means the deployment and manipulation of human resources, financial resources, technological resources, and natural resources.” (Kaplan, 2014). Dyck and Neubert (2012) defines management science as “applied mathematics, statistics, and other quantitative techniques to management planning, decision making, and problem solving.” (p. 45).

An organization is a goal-directed, deliberately structured group of people working together to achieve results. Henri Fayol’s (1949) four functions of management are: Planning, (Organizing, Leading and Controlling. Henry Mintzberg (1987) conceptualized Managerial Roles and Subrules as: Interpersonal roles (leader, liaison, figurehead), Decisional roles (resource allocator, negotiator, entrepreneur, crisis handler) and Informational roles (monitor, disseminator, spokesperson).

There are two approaches to defining effective management (Max Weber, 1947; in Gerth & Mills,1958). But it was Dyck and Neubert (2012) that coined mainstream and multistream management. Mainstream management emphasis is on materialism and individualism and its primary goals includes maximizing productivity, profitability, and competitiveness. However, Multistream management emphasis is on multiple forms of well-being and multiple stakeholders. There are nine elements of well-being. (Dyck & Neubert, 2012).

1. Aesthetic: beauty, art, poetry.

2. Ecological: natural environment, minimal pollution.

3. Emotional: satisfaction, positive feelings, hope, joy.

4. Individual: personal convenience, one’s own interests.

5. Intellectual: ideas, clear rationale, theory, concepts.

6. Material: Finances, productivity, tangible goods, efficiency.

7. Physical: health, safety, security.

8. Social: community-mindedness, justice, helping others.

9. Spiritual: meaning, interconnectedness, transcendent,

Mainstream and Multistream managers represent two prototypes or ideal types on opposite extremes of a continuum (Dyck & Neubert, 2012).

Table 8. Mainstream/Old vs. Multistream/New Management

Two approaches to planning: a) Mainstream: measurable goals, bottom-line monetary focus, top-down linear analysis; uses SMART 1: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Results-based, Time-specific; and b) Multistream: practical wisdom, participation, goals other than monetary. Uses SMART 2: Significant, Meaningful, Agreed upon, Relevant, Timely.

Table 9. Mainstream vs. Multistream Planning

2. Two approaches to organizing: a) Mainstream: centralization, standardization, specialization and b) Multistream: courage, experimentation (1) Courage – implementing initiatives that have potential to improve overall happiness even if it might threaten one’s own status.

Table 10. Mainstream vs. Multistream Organizing

3.Two approaches to leading: a) Mainstream: instrumental motivation, extrinsic rewards, output-oriented (1) Instrumental skills – Getting people to act in ways that fulfill our own needs b) Multistream: relational self-control, dignity, facilitate intrinsic motivation (1) Relationship skills – Used to create and deepen relationships because relationships are viewed as ends rather than as means to achieve one’s personal objectives.

Table 11. Mainstream vs. Multistream Leading

Two approaches to controlling: a) Mainstream: vigilance, monitoring, ensuring that members do what they are supposed to be doing: (1) Value chain is sequencing of activities needed to convert organizational inputs into outputs. (2) Information systems helps identify, collect, organize, and disseminate information. (3) Bureaucratic control is emphasis on rules, regulations, policies, and standard operating procedures to control organizational members and b) Multistream: (1) controlling via fairness and being sensitive to sub-optimal conditions. (2) ensuring actions are consistent the organization’s values and standard.

Table 12. Mainstream v. Multistream Controlling

Mainstream Management is based on Newtonian physical science; the discovery of the: Laws of Nature made mankind focus on the resources of the earth. Literally, the biblical command to “Have dominion over the whole world” was taken seriously by Great Britain’s conquest where the sun never sets at the British Empire during the colonial period. Spain and Portugal divided the world and it was validated by the Pope of the Roman Catholics. Christopher Columbus and Ferdinand Magellan explored various parts of the globe. Statistics and mathematical formulae became scientific models in explaining natural phenomena. Cartesian logic became the popular syllogism.

Multistream Management is better understood in terms of metaphysics. Quantum Physics. the study of smallest particle of matter; it espouses the power of human consciousness, such that “the mind is [considered] the soul governing agency of the body”. Further appreciation of the mind-body relationship is the assertion of that the new atom is 99.999 percent energy and only .009 percent matter. Translated into our human existence, we are therefore energy and very insignificant matter. Einstein’s Energy equals Mass time Speed of Light squared affirms our nature as spirit in relation to our body, which has energy. Teilhard de Chardin (1993) and Covey (2000) affirms that we are spiritual beings with human activities and not the other way around.

The observer-reality relationship in quantum physics illuminates objectivity because quantum physics “tells us that nothing that is observed is unaffected by the observer. That statement, from science, holds an enormous powerful insight. It means that everyone sees a different truth because everyone is creating what they see.” (Walsh, 2016). Bluestone (1997) says, “Western and Chinese alchemist had one thing in common…the smallest object of material reality was a reflection of a larger cosmic whole. Monk Basil Valenti the human body was a microcosm of the universe. In the Chinese Tao, everything on earth was a reflection of its divine form.” (p. 62).

In the 21st century Harari (2018) asserts that he who owns data owns the future. Taleb (2012) avers that we need to be antifragile amidst the challenges of this century. Is Technology the New King, going hand in hand with the Queen of Social Sciences? Dyck and Neubert (2012) challenges the traditional business paradigm as they consider mainstream [old] as a total concentration on profit but with multistream management the [new] concern of business well-being. Harari (2016) in Homo Deus asserts that our species as humans is has been evolving from the lower life forms to being a Homo Sapiens, which believes is headed to be Homo Deus, a technologically sophisticate human form. In 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, again, he predicted and it is happening now that he who hold data, big data holds the future.

EDUCATION IN THE 21^ST CENTURY

Pedagogy.

The original description of learning methodology is pedagogy, which is the “art, science, or profession of teaching; especially: education.” (Merriam-Webster). This definition covers many aspects of teaching which include teaching styles, feedback, and assessment. Current views cites pedagogy to literally mean “leading children.”

Malcolm Knowles (1984) theorized that methods used to teach children are often not the most effective means of teaching adults. Pedagogy is a child-focused teaching approach, whereas andragogy an adult-focused teaching approach; or, formally, pedagogy is the art and science of helping kids learn, whereas andragogy is the art and science of helping adults learn. Malcolm Knowles (1984) says that andragogy is based on a self-directed, independent learning method for adults. This theory asserts that learning programs must support the notion that adults are self-driven and take responsibility for decisions.

Andragogy

Andragogy is a term coined to refer to the art/science of teaching adults. Knowles’ (1984) theory of andragogy is an attempt to develop a theory specifically for adult learning. Knowles emphasizes that adults are self-directed and expect to take responsibility for decisions. Adult learning programs must accommodate this fundamental aspect. Thus, andragogy is an approach in participatory learning based on the premise that adult students are propelled to learn on real life situation based as they can bring they own experiences and knowledge into the classroom and they can immediately practice to their lives and careers.

Mezirow’s (1991) transformative learning is defined as “an orientation which holds that the way learners interpret and reinterpret their sense experience is central to making meaning and hence learning.” Put in simple terms, transformative learning is the idea that learners who are getting new information are also evaluating their past ideas and understanding, and are shifting their very worldview as they obtain new information and through critical reflection. It goes beyond simply acquiring knowledge, and dives into the way that learners find meaning in their lives and understanding. This kind of learning experience involves a fundamental change in our perceptions—learners start to question all the things they knew or thought before and examine things from new perspectives in order to make room for new insights and information. Many learners and experts agree that this kind of learning leads to true freedom of thought and understanding.

Mezirow (1991) says that transformative learning has two basic focuses—instrumental learning and communicative learning. Instrumental learning focuses on task-oriented problem solving, and evaluation of cause-and-effect relationships. Communicative learning focuses on how people communicate their feelings, needs, and desires. Both of these elements are important in transformative learning—students need to be able to focus on different types of their understanding and view new perspectives that are both logical and emotional in order to challenge their previous understanding.

Meaning schemes or meaning structures are another important element of the transformative theory and transformational learning according to Mezirow. Perspectives and meaning schemes two major elements of meaning structures, and are our predispositions and assumptions, which set the state for our expectations. A meaning structure is basically the concepts, beliefs, judgments, and feelings that shape an interpretation of information. Students are able to understand their meaning structure through self-reflection, self-directed learning, and critical theory. They are able to critique their assumptions to understand if what they understood as a child still holds true now that they are an adult. We are thereby able to understand ourselves, and our learning better. The understanding of our past perspective and the ability to look at new structures and perspectives are key to the transformative learning theory.

1. An understanding of the differences in assumptions about learners and the skills required

for learning under teacher-directed learning and self-directed learning, and the ability to

explain these differences to others.

2. A concept of myself as being a non-dependent and a self-directing person.

3. The ability to relate to peers collaboratively, to see them as resources for diagnosing needs,

planning my learning, and learning; and to give help to them and receive help from them.

4. The ability to diagnose my own learning needs realistically, with help from teachers and

peers.

5. The ability to translate learning needs into learning objectives in a form that makes it

possible for their accomplishment to be assessed.

6. The ability to relate to teachers as facilitators, helpers, or consultants, and to take the

initiative in making use of their resources.

7. The ability to identify human and material resources appropriate to different kinds of

Learning objectives.

8. The ability to select effective strategies for making use of learning resources and to perform

these strategies skillfully and with initiative

9. The ability to collect and validate evidence of the accomplishment of various kinds of

learning objectives. (Henschke, 2009).

The role of the instructor and the participation of the learning is shown in Figure 1. The continuum shows that in pedagogy the learner has less control in method and learning content; heutagogy allows the learner to be self-determined. In terms of the role of the instructor, in pedagogy, there is more instructor control and course structuring; in heutagogy there is less instructor control and course structuring.

The idea is that the learner drives the learning completely, independently, and does not follow a linear route. The learner seeks self-actualization and goes through a process of personal values development (Maslow, 1962; McLeod, 2020; Hall Kalven, Rosen, & Taylor, c1991); The teacher is simply a guide and facilitator (Sing, n.d.) inside and outside the classroom, face-to-face or virtual learning.

Figure 1. Learner’s freedom in Pedagogy, Andragogy and Heutagogy

www.schoology.com/blog/heutagogy-explained-self-determined-learning-education

Heutagogy

The term heutagogy was first coined by Stewart Hase and Chris Kenyon in 2000 as an extension to andragogy and means self-determined learning. Its foundations are constructivism and humanism, along with capability, open-systems thinking and complexity theory.

Heutagogy, a form of self-determined learning with practices and principles rooted in andragogy. In a heutagogical approach to teaching and learning, learners are highly autonomous and self-determined and emphasis is placed on development of learner capacity and capability with the goal of producing learners who are well-prepared for the complexities of 31^st century workplace. The approach is most appropriate in dealing with emerging technologies in virtual learning through distance education and for guiding distance education practice and the ways in which distance educators develop and deliver instruction using newer technologies such as social media and applications, like CANVAS and Microsoft Team.

The renewed interest in heutagogy is partially due to the existence of Web 2.0 being promoted by the technology. With its learner-centered design, Web 2.0 offers an environment that supports a heutagogical approach, most importantly by supporting development of learner-generated content and learner self-directedness in information discovery and in defining the learning path. (Blaschke, n.d.)

Blaschke (2019) avers that educators need to equip students for 21^st century workforce in a world in which lifelong learning; one approach is to develop a self-determined, autonomous learners capable of acquiring and building upon their knowledge through online personal learning environments (PLEs). A comparative description on the elements of pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy is shown in Table 13. It differentiates learning aspects in terms of 1. Dependence, 2. Teaching resources, 3. Learning reasons, 4. Learning focus, 5. Motivation, and 6. Teaching role.

Heutagogy in Figure 2 shows the four dimensions of a learning designing in a heutagogical approach: 1. Learning agency, 2. Capability/self-efficacy, 3. Reflection/metacognition and 4. Non-linear design.

Figure 2. Learning Dimensions of Heutagogy

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_9

A comparative description on the elements of pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy is shown in Table 13. It differentiates learning aspects in terms of 1. Dependence, 2. Teaching resources, 3. Learning reasons, 4. Learning focus, 5. Motivation, and 6. Teaching role. Heutagogy is a philosophical approach that aims to help learners self-develop as problem-solvers, trouble-shooters and action-takers making continuous improvement: those who can work developmentally in learning organizations.

Table 13. Pedagogy, Andragogy and Heutagogy

www.samyoung.co.nz/2018/03/heutagogy-art-of-self-directed-learning.html

The 21^st century dominated by artificial intelligence (AI) that has invaded our educational institutions, heutagogical approach plays a critical mode in the delivery of learning inside and outside the classroom. The renewed interest in heutagogy is partially due to the existence of Web 2.0 being promoted by the technology. With its learner-centered design, Web 2.0 technology offers an environment that supports a heutagogical approach, most importantly by supporting development of learner-generated content and learner self-directedness in information discovery and in defining the learning path. (Blaschke, n.d.)

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY

Pande and Vian (2009) aver that the citizen of the future will be “a native of the network and that changes everything. It tempers border-based boundaries. It refocuses political notion on issues that are both more local and more global at he same time. It links expressiveness to empowerment and turns the smart consumer o the early internet era into activist citizen of the coming decades. The network superstructs citizenship.” Harari (2016; 2018) affirms the role of technology in all aspects of the life of a 21st century human who has become a Homo Deus, interacting with artificial intelligence in a widely networked relationship.

Human Welfare, Digitilization, Digitalization and Digital Transformation

Human welfare encompasses many aspects of an individual’s wellbeing, including their labor rights, working conditions, equitable treatment and access to resources and opportunities, regardless of their sex or gender. Welfare ub economics is the study of how the allocation of resources and goods affects social welfare. … In practical terms, welfare economists seek to provide tools to guide public policy to achieve beneficial social and economic outcomes for all of society. The classical definition of human welfare in Aristotelian philosophy is for each one to fine happiness. He cites the pursuit of what is true, good and beautiful as ultimate objects for human to be happy. In a democratic setting, the idea of common good is stressed over and above personal good. The United Nations has made a declaration on Human Rights to secure the happiness of every citizen. However, with the rise of digital technology human welfare is drastically challenged as human freedom and personal rights are under attack.

Digitilization refers to information while digitalization refers to the process. Digitalization refers to enabling or improving processes by leveraging digital technologies and digitized data. Digital Transformation is really business transformation enabled by digitalization. (Cruz, 2021).

Digitization is the process of converting information from a physical format to digital one. It means converting something non-digital into a digital representation to be used by computer systems and automate processes or workflows. Digitization enables to create business value, which needs data. It helps to lay the foundation for business use cases that leverage the data.

Digitalization is the process of leveraging digitization to improve business processes. Digitalization means making digitized information work for you. This term refers to the use of digital technologies and data to create revenue, improve business, and create a digital culture where digital information is at the core. It converts processes to be more efficient, productive, and profitable.

Digital technology are tools that include all automatic systems, technological devisees that generate, process or store information.it has practically replaced what used to be known as analog technology. Examples are websites, online buying and selling; smartphones, block chain, cryptocurrency, clout computing, voice interfaces or chat boxes; video streaming, eBooks, blogs, social media, 3D printing; ATM machines; digital cameras and drones. (Cruz, 2021)

Digital transformation is the transformation of business activities, processes, products, and models to fully leverage the opportunities of digital technologies. The main goal is to improve efficiency, manage risk or discover new monetization opportunities. Digital transformation is doing things in a new (digital) way.

The Future

Harari (2016) in Homo Deus asserts that our species as humans is has been evolving from the lower life forms to being a Homo Sapiens, which believes is headed to be Homo Deus, a technologically sophisticate human form. The power of digital technology is summarized in a saying that “He who hold big data, hold the future. Access to data has come the key to economic and political power. It has become the key to commercial success. The abuse of data privacy by many strong companies that have monopolized data technologies has been a source of worry for most people. That is the reason we are seeing the increase of governments imposing data privacy laws.

In 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, again, he predicted and it is happening now that he who hold data, big data holds the future. He continues to say, “Humankind is losing faith in the liberal story that dominated global politics in recent decades, exactly where the merger of biotech and infotech confronts us with the biggest challenges humankind has ever encountered.” (Harari, 2018).

He concludes on the power and dominance of technology through artificial intelligence (AI), “If we manage to combine a universal econo0mic safety net with strong communities and meaningful pursuits, losing our jobs to the algorithms might actually turn out to be a blessing. Losing control over our lives, however, is a much scarier scenario. Notwithstanding the danger of mass unemployment, what we should worry about even more is the shift I authority from humans to algorithms, which might destroy any remaining faith in the liberal story and open the way to the rise of digital dictatorship.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Cartesian philosophy and Newtonian physical science influenced business management to focus on material gain and bottom-line profitability of mainstream/old management. At times, this was at the expense of human welfare of the laborers and the community.

2. Three quantum gurus were presented to show the shift in leadership and organizational development from Cartersian-Newtonian science to a quantum perspective in personal development and organizational development.

3. Quantum mechanics influenced business management to focus on our higher consciousness, addressing wellbeing of stakeholders. Profitability is only one of the 9 goals of multistream/new management.

4. In education, attention should be given to pedagogy as child learning method, andragogy as adult-learning method and heutagogy as self-efficacious method. Teachers must adjust their learning methods based on the age and learning maturity of the students. No more one method fits all learners.

5. The Age of Digitalization has posed tremendous benefits for humanity. The speed and the scope of communication technology has brought humanity to state of virtual reality that allows relationships to prosper in a distance.

6. Business has the greatest advantage in promoting its economic interest through digital technology that allow innovation products that are available globally. But business has also taken advantage of technology to further capture humanity and expand its economic interests.

7. The rise of AI continues to promote benefits to humanity in biotechnology and infotechnology. However, from the point of view of ultimate control and dominance there is a question on whether technology will enslave humanity under a modified form of governance.

8. The challenge then is: Will humanity surrender its freedom to AI or will AI in the hand of a few control humanity.

REFERENCES

Beck, M.N. (2012). Finding Your Way in a Wild New World: Reclaim Your True Nature to Create the Life You Want. New York: Free Press.

Blaschke, L.M. (n.d.) Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ979639.pdf

Blaschke, L.M. (2019). The Pedagogy–Andragogy–Heutagogy Continuum and Technology-Supported Personal Learning Environments. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_9.

Bluestone, S. (1997). Signs of the times. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.

Cruz, E.S. (Nov. 7, 2021). A digital world, Breakthrough. The Philippine Daily Inquirer.

de Chardin. P.T. in The Joy of Kindness (1993), by Robert J. Furey, p. 138; attributed to G. I.

Gurdjieff in Beyond Prophecies and Predictions: Everyone’s Guide to The Coming Changes (1993) by Moira Timms, p. 62; neither cite a source; popularized by Wayne Dyer, who often quotes it in his presentations, crediting it to Chardin, as does Stephen Covey in Living the 7 Habits : Stories of Courage and Inspiration (2000), p. 47. Such statements could be considered paraphrases of Hegel’s dictum that matter is spirit fallen into a state of self-otherness.

Descartes, R. (2008). Meditations on first philosophy. Translated by Michael Moriarty, Oxford University Press.

Dyck, B. & Neubert, M.J. (2012). Management. Singapore: Cengage Learning.

Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. London, Pitman.

Gonzalez, F.S.C., Luz, J. M., & Tirol, M.H. (1984). De La Salle mission statement:

Retrospect and prospect. Quezon City: Vera Reyes, Inc., 46, 19-24, 14-16, 4.

Hall, B., Kalven, J., Rosen, L.S., & Taylor, B. (c1991). Values Development: Diagnostic Sourcebook. WI: International Values Institute of Mariam College.

Hapon, M. (2021), What Is the Difference Between Digitization, Digitalization and Digital

Transformation. (https://www.netguru.com/blog/digitization-and-digitalization)

Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. London: Vintage.

__________.(2018). 21 lessons for the 21st century. London: Jonathan Cape.

Hase, S. & Kenyon, 2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301339522_From_andragogy_to_heutagogy

Henschke, J. A. (2009). A Perspective on the History and Philosophy of Andragogy: An International

Sketch. IACE Hall of Fame Repository.

https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1433&context=utk_IACE-browseall

Hudtohan, E. T. (2005). 50 years of De La Salle catechetical program: Retrospect and prospect. Retrieved

from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/104

Karakas, F. (2009). New paradigms in organization development: Positivity, spirituality, and complexity.

Organization Development Journal, 27(1), https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-06172-001

Kaplan, A. (2014). European Management and European Business Schools: Insights from the History of

Business Schools, European Management Journal.

Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McLeod, S. (2020). Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html

Marinoff, (2007). The middle way: Finding happiness in a world of extremes. NY: Sterling Publishing Co.,

Inc.

Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.

Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company.

Max Weber, M. (1947). The theory of Social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.

Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. New York:

Harper and Row.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Moustakas, C. & Douglass, B. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know. Journal of

Humanistic Psychology, 25(3).

Newton, I (1642-1727). Principia: Thhe mathematical principles of natural philosophy / (New-York : Published by Daniel Adee, [c1846] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301339522_From_andragogy_to_heutagogy

Pande, M. & Vian, K. (2009). Civil Society: Networked Citizens. Ten-Year Forecast Perspective, Institute of the Future. www.iftf.org.

Richardson, M.H. (2015). The quantum God: An investigation of the image of God from Quantum

Science. A masteral thesis. St. Mary’s University. Halifax. Nova Scotia

Sela-Smith, S. (July 2002). Heuristic Research: A Review and Critique of Moustakas’s Method

Journal of Humanistic Psychology 42(3):53-88.

Singh, S. (n.d.). Teaching & Research: Role of Teacher as Facilitator in Classroom.

https://www.academia.edu/11577977/Teaching_and_Research_Role_of_Teacher_as_Facilitator_in_Classroom

Smith, J. (2015). Business research methodology. New York: Arcler Press LLC.

Stebbins, R.A. (2011). What Is Exploration? In: Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences

London: SAGE Publications, Inc. City: Thousand Oaks

Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House

Tony Knight @ freeAgent42, (2018). https://medium.com/@tonyknight_92437/the-field-is-the-sole-

governing-agency-of-the-particle-einstein-1f770090a926

Walsh, R. (2007). The world of shamanism: New views of an ancient tradition. Woodbury, Minnesota:

Llewellyn Publication, p.59.

Weber, M. (1947). Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York : London :Free Press

Weber, M., In Gerth, H., & In Mills, C. W. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York:

Oxford University Press

Wheatley, M.J. (2006). Leadership and the new science: discovering order in a chaotic world. San

Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

__________. (2007). Finding our way: Leadership for an uncertain time. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-

Koehler Publishing.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The Emergence of Spiritual Civilization in the 21st Century

Written By: SuperAdmin - Jun.26,2023

Abstract

This is an attempt to paint a picture of a Spiritual Civilization in the 21st century. The term is not yet mainstream but after the Digital Civilization, a Global Civilization and Ecological Civilization, the idea it appears that a Spiritual Civilization is an emerging phenomenon in the 21st century. To build my case, I primarily used Erwin Laszlo’s Chaos Point to explore this concept, Christine Page’s great period of change (1987- 2023), Teilhard de Chardin and Wayne Dyer’s assertion that we are spiritual beings, Dispenza’s quantum view that an atom is 99.999 percent energy and only .001 percent matter, James Ray’ assertion that we are an energy field operating in a larger energy field and O’Murchu’s quantum theology defining God as pure energy. I thought Spiritual Civilization is a pioneering concept to be promoted but my review of related literature revealed that there exists a Social Spiritual Civilization written by Qi Zhenhai and Jingshen Wenming. My tentative conclusion is: If Christianity peaks in our true humanity, the Chinese view of being fully human makes them anonymous Christians. If we are spiritual beings with human activities, without the dominance of organized religion, an individual is de facto a participant in a Spiritual Civilization.

Keywords spiritual civilization, digital civilization, global civilization, spiritual being, energy field, and social spiritual civilization.

[Title Here, up to 12 Words, on One to Two Lines]

[The body of your paper uses a half-inch first line indent and is double-spaced. APA style provides for up to five heading levels, shown in the paragraphs that follow. Note that the word

The Great Period of Change

Marinoof (2007). In his book, The Middle Way, cited four ideograph that triggered four great civilizations. These are: Hellenic, Abrahamic, Sinic, and Vedic great ideas that flourished around the world. The onset of Cartesian philosophy triggered a rational approach to human thinking paradigm that was anchored on logic and reason. Rene Descartes was a leading figure in a Rational Civilization. Newtonian physics that explained the laws of Nature triggered a Scientific Civilization. The colonial period was the age of exploration of natural resources. With abundant resource it propelled an Industrial Civilization. This was followed by a Global Civilization in the age of multinational corporations operating worldwide. By this time overproduction and overconsumption have created an ecological crisis. Laszlo (2006) averred humanty has reached Chaos Point, forcing us to break down or make a break through. Visionaries are optimistic we will survive the Great Period of Change (1987-2023) leading humanity to a New Enlightenment. This I call a Spiritual Civilization, after the pitfalls of Global Civilization and the new world after the Great Period of Change.

End of the Period of Change

The big picture on what is happening today is that we live in a Great Period of Change which began in 1987 and ends in 2023 (Page, 2012; Jenkins, 2012, Braden, 2009; Laszlo, 2006). What then do we expect at the end of this Great Period of Change? Christian Page says, “The Mayan calendar saw the beginning of an extraordinary journey of 36,000 years for the earth and its inhabitants, which reaches its conclusion just before 2020. For the first time in 26,000 years, the sun is most closely aligned with Great Cleft, Dark Rift or the Black Road of the Milky Way. (Page, 2008).

The year 2023 appears to be the end of the dark tunnel. We will make a breakthrough (Laszlo,2006) As we come close to 2023, the end of the Great Period of Change, our present state I consider Global Civilization is moving towards a new era of New Enlightenment (Page, 2012). Ambassador Manalo (personal communication, July 31, 2921) during an interview with Sass Sassot SMNI Network, said that from the Cold War we moved to Globalization. However, she did not cite our new state of affairs that would follow Global Civilization we are experience today.

With a cosmological lens and from my review of related literature, I foresee that a Spiritual Civilization is emerging. A number of 21st century gurus, like Chardin and Dyer (spiritual beings), James Ray (energy field), Dispensa (atom is 99.999 percent energy .001 percent matter) and O’Murchu (God is energy) show us the way to a spiritual civilization. Neale Donald Walsch (2021) says, The heart is the bridge between the mind and the soul. First get out of your mind and into your heart space. From there it is a quick jump into your soul. On July 21, 2021, a Facebook post of M.P. Hudtohan tells us a Spiritual Civilization is emerging at Youtube.com: The Apocalypse of Belief – Healing.

New Civilization

A number of definitions help us understand what civilization is. It is an advanced state of human society, in which a high level of culture, science, industry, and government has been reached. Historically, civilization has been understood as a larger and a more advanced culture, in implied contrast to smaller, supposedly primitive cultures. This is the type of culture and society developed by a particular nation or region or in a particular epoch. Lastly, civilization refers to a society or group of people or the process of achieving a higher state of social development. In this discourse, my context of civilization is more of a cultural refinement; refinement of thought and cultural appreciation on ecological civilization, digital civilization, global civilization and ecological civilization, leading to a spiritual civilization.

This narrative was inspired by the Ecological Civilization of President Xi Jinping. For the first time in our history, a civilization is connected to a supposedly non-human entity, planet earth. But this is not surprising because current literature has considered planet earth as someone who is alive. Digital civilization rules in the 21st century; no doubt it has created a new world of technology connecting people, resulting to a new way of life. Today, technology has overtaken economics as driver in solving problems. It has seeped in deep into all aspects of human activities, such that human is transformed into homo deus and In the 21st century he who owns data owns the future. (Harari, 2018). Global civilization has for long been practiced with physical conquest of territoriality that peaked during the colonial period. The four ideographs of Marinoff (2007) namely, the Hellenic civilization, Abrahamic, Vedic civilization and Sinic civilization are considered major influencers of global culture.

Politics has been observed by Acemoglu and Robinson (2013) that nations are poor not because of ignorance and culture but because of their leaders that exercise power of choice to advantage (p.68). They say that economics has been hailed as the Queen of Social Sciences “by choosing solved political problems as its domain” (Lerner, 1972). Business driven by pure desire for profit has been debunked by Dyck and Neubert’s (2012) multistream management, which directs the attention of management to focus on wellbeing of stakeholders. Wellbeing has nine elements and profit (materiality, and money) is only one of the elements. The 2018 sustainable development of China crafted by President Xi Jinping shows that politics is key to creating a new culture in ecological civilization. Government manages business [economics], citizens [society] and behavior [culture] in order to protect and promote an ecological civilization (2019),

Spirituality as an existential experience has seeped into business and for that matter human economic endeavors. But more recently a spiritual civilization is rising with our experience of non-material values that indicate that we are spiritual beings (Dyck & Neubert, 2012; Chardin, n.s.; Dyer, n.d.).

End of the Period of Change

New Civilization

Foundation of Spiritual Civilization

Quantum Theology.

We are Spiritual Beings. Our being spiritual can be established from various perspective: theological, metaphysical, cosmological and psychological.

The bible says that we are made to the image and likeness of God. This puts our nature at the level of the spirit because God is not a material being. O’Murchu (2004) in quantum theology says, “Principle 1. Life is sustained by a creative energy, fundamentally benign in nature, with a tendency to manifest and express itself in movement, rhythm, and patter. Creation is sustained by a superhuman, pulsating restlessness, a type of resonance vibrating throughout time and eternity. a. God and the divine are described as creative energy, which is perceived to include, but also supersede, everything traditional theology attributes to God. b. The divine energy is not stable or unchanging, but works through movement, rhythm, pattern, and restlessness – within the evolving nature of life itself. In Principle 9, he continues to say that Humans are innately spiritual – so are all life forms – and if appropriate human and spiritual maturation takes place, humans feel a need to celebrate, in ritual and sacrament, their relationship with the ultimate mystery.”

Metaphysical View. James Ray (2006) says, “Most people define themselves by this finite, but you’re not a finite body…you are an energy field. What we know about energy is this. Quantum physicist says: it can never be created or destroyed, it always was, always has been, everything that ever exists always exists, its’ moving into form, through form and out of form, theologian says God created the universe. God is always was and always has been, never can be created or destroyed, all that ever was, always will be, always moving into rom, through form and out of form. It’s the same description, just different terminology. So if you think you’re this ‘meat suit’ … think again you’re a spiritual being. Your energy field, operating in a larger energy field.” (p.158-59). This supported by Dr. Dispensa who said that an atom is 99.000 percent energy and only .001 percent matter. We are a composite of atoms and thus we are 99.000 percent energy, affirming O’Murchu and Ray.

Energy centers from Hindu, Catholic and Jewish Perspectives

Figure 1. Energy Centers: Hindu, Catholic and Jewish

The seven Chakras is explained by Sarah Regan (2020) in Your Guide To The 7 Chakra Colors & How To Use Them. She says: “1. Root Chakra is our foundation. It develops in our first seven years of life and deals with survival and security needs. It’s represented by the color red, and when out of balance, we may feel insecure, unsafe, and even disconnected from reality.” Th Catholic theology sacrament of extreme unction prepares the believer for life everlasting. In Kabbalah it is being in touch with the Divine, a spiritual Being.

Regan says that “2.The sacral chakra, which is located in your lower abdomen, is all about creativity and sexuality. It’s associated with orange and is formed in the seven years after your root chakra until age 14. Christian believers relates this to a special vocation of being a priest ordained with special power to mediate between God and His people. Kabbalah is being in touch with divine wisdom and understanding.

Regan says that “3. Solar plexus chakra is from the lower to the upper abdomen, you’ll find your solar plexus chakra, which is associated with the color yellow. This chakra deals with confidence as well as overall self-worth and self-esteem.” In Catholic theology, this is related to the sacrament of Confession, a powerful exercise of self-examination and revelation of one’s weakness in order to become a better person. Kabbalah interprets this as capacity to receive and give mercy and compassion.

Regan says that “4. Heart Chakra is next is the heart chakra—located just above your heart in the center of your chest—which is associated with the color green. It deals with our ability to both give and receive love to ourselves and others. This is the sacrament of Marriage in Catholic theology. It is a manifestation of divine love in human form. In Kabbalah, it is an expression of human love and compassion.

Regan says that “5. Throat Chakra is associated with light blue or turquoise, is all about expression and truth. When it’s open, we can communicate our truth clearly and effectively. When it’s blocked, we struggle to share authentically.” This is the sacrament of Confirmation in Catholic theology. The symbol when one receives this sacrament is a light slap on the face of the believer. It symbolizes his/her strength to be strong and stand for the faith. Kabbalah related to the human virtue of integrity and endurance in life’s challenges.

Regan says that “6. Third-Eye Chakra. As we get older, we get closer and closer to self-actualization. From ages 36 to 42, our third-eye chakra develops, and it’s associated with dark blue and purple shades. It deals with intuition and our ability to move past our ego. When it’s unbalanced, we’ll feel out of touch with our intuition.” Catholic theology related this with the sacrament of the Holy Eucharist. It is receiving the Body of Christ and being transformed as a Christian who sees all of life with eyes of Jesus Himself. Kabbalah relates this with acts of creation, seeing and making all things.

Regan says that “7. Crown Chakra is at the crown of our head. The final chakra is associated with shades of violet and glowing white. It develops when someone has become evolved enough to tap into higher consciousness—something that can take a lifetime and doesn’t happen for everyone. This is related to the sacrament of Baptism, where the believer is born to a new life in Christ being gifted with a new life free from human sin and frailty. He receives the power that makes him, the image and likeness of God Himself. Kabbalah relates with connection to life at its purist and highest manifestation.

As global citizens, we are challenged to understand our own spiritual roots and at the same time understand how other cultures have a similar concept and experience of the spiritual and the experience of a divine in a different mode of spirituality. The commonality the chakra, sacraments and Kabbalah is that they speak of the same language in terms of energy. This confirms the advanced notions of quantum physics, telling us that we are spiritual, we are divine and that we are 99.999 percent energy because of the existence of atoms and quarks in our physical existence.

Inspirational Authors.

Teilhard de Chardin was supposed to have said: “We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience.” But this quote is also attributed to other authors. This above statement also appeared as the epigraph of chapter two within the book. Dye. He is the leading candidate for creator of the saying. But Dyer did attribute an unrelated quotation about love to Pierre Teilhard de Chardin within the 1989 book, but he did not link Chardin to the target quotation.

In 1989 educator and motivational author Stephen R. Covey published the influential work “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People”. Covey presented an instance of the saying and credited Chardin. He said: To the degree to which we align ourselves with correct principles, divine endowments will be released within our nature in enabling us to fulfill the measure of our creation. In the words of Teilhard de Chardin, “We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience.”

Wayne W. Dyer employed a version of the saying in 1988, and he is the most likely creator based on available evidence. This ascription may shift if new illuminating citations are uncovered. Stephen R. Covey attributed the saying to Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, but there is no substantive support for his claim at this time.

Neale Donald Walsch (2021) The heart is the bridge between the mind and the soul. First get out of your mind and into your heart space. From there it is a quick jump into your soul. July 21, 2021 (Facebook post, M.P.Hudtohan) youtube.com The Apocalypse of Belief – Healing Our Culture. http://www.brucelipton.comHumans evolved from within a “Garden,” posted July 22, 2021

What is spirituality?

Fahlberg and Fahlberg (1991) avers that “The difficulty in addressing the concept of spirituality is related to both its association with denominational religion and our cultural emphasis on the material realm. However, some scholars are now associating spirituality with the development of human consciousness beyond the ego level Thus, investigation in the realms of consciousness beyond the ego can be addressed within theories of knowledge that are grounded in experience.”

An open definition of spirituality is “people’s multiform search for meaning interconnecting them with all living beings and to God or Ultimate Reality. Within this definition there is room for differing views, for spiritualities with and without God and for an ethics of dialogue” (European SPES Institute, n.d.).

In their management textbook, Dyck and Neubert (2011, p.490) define spirituality as “a state or quality of a heightened sensitivity to one’s human or transcendental spirit.” Western authors use the word ‘meaning’ to imply a transcendent value which directly or indirectly implies spirituality (Tolle, 2005; Ulrich, 2012; Kilmann, 2001; Hicks & Hicks, 2010; Pape, 2014; Craig & Snook, 2014). Warren (2002) is more direct in weaving purpose as meaningful experience of God. Fifty years ago, Van Kaam (1964, p.42) noted that “Ultimate meaning…is grounded in [man] himself, others, and the ultimate Other.”

In 2015, Unilever in London commissioned Authentic Leadership Institute (2014) to design their Purpose Drives Leadership Program 2020, a workshop intended to “make sustainable living commonplace in the UK and Ireland” (Radjou & Prabhu, 2015). Unilever’s 2020 workshop considers purpose as very crucial at the workplace and the spirituality of leaders finds meaning in accomplishing corporate purpose (JHudtohan, personal communication, 2015). Julian (2014) in his book, God is my CEO, cites the faith-work experience of 20 executive leaders. He used the Bible as point of reference in grounding the principles and values of the chief executive officers in America.

Spirituality and Consciousness.

According to Mayer (2007), Spirituality requires consciousness because we need to be aware, and to be self-aware, in order to apprehend spirituality of any kind. Some make the extravagant claim that our human consciousness is somehow connected directly to a ‘cosmic consciousness’.

He continues to say that spiritual intelligence includes: 1. Capacity for transcendence, 2. Ability to enter into heightened spiritual states of consciousness, 3. Ability to invest everyday activities, events, and relationships with a sense of the sacred., 4. Ability to utilized spiritual resources to solve problems in living, and 5. Capacity to engage in various behavior or to be virtuous (to show forgiveness, to express gratitude, to be humble, to display compassion. Heightened intelligence is heightened consciousness. The idea of spiritual consciousness stems from the possibility of structuring consciousness through meditative contemplation…o that it focuses on oneness, transcendent states, and ultimate concerns. The shift in language of mental ability to one of consciousness and awareness yields a spiritual consciousness.

According to Aumunn (1985, p.3) Christian spirituality in the Catholic tradition is about “the lives and teachings of men and women who have reached a high degree of sanctity throughout the ages…[that] the perfection of charity can be attained by any Christian in any state of life.” Downey (1997) opines that “Christian spirituality…is the Christian Life itself lived in and through the presence and power of the Holy Spirit. It concerns absolutely every dimension of life, mind and body, intimacy and sexuality, work and leisure, economic accountability and political responsibility, domestic life and civic duty, the rising costs of health care and the plight of the poor and wounded both at home and abroad. Absolutely every dimension of life is to be integrated and transformed by the presence and power of the Holy Spirit.”

From a psycho-spiritual point of view, spirituality considered as wholeness and wholeness is equated to holiness because human and spiritual development are intertwined (Erickson, 1968; Shea, 2004; Caluag, 1980). Friel (n.d.) says, spirituality can be defined as a “fully human phenomenon, and it is a phenomenon of the fully human.”

Emergence of a Spiritual Civilization

In this narrative, consciousness is widely used by the commentators. As discussed earlier, spirituality requires consciousness because we need to be aware, and to be self-aware, in order to apprehend spirituality of any kind (Mayer, 2007). Thus, it is assumed that we are spiritual beings with human activities. Laszlo’s image of the New Civilization is in fact an image of an emerging Spiritual Civilization where humanity adapts to a new worldview, life ways, morality, decision-making and moves to a new consciousness, affirming an emergence of a Spiritual Civilization.

Worldview 2025

A worldview is the set of beliefs about fundamental aspects of Reality that ground and influence all one’s perceiving, thinking, knowing, and doing (Funk, 2001). One’s worldview is one’s philosophy, philosophy of life, mindset, outlook on life, formula for life, ideology, faith and religious belief. For me it is a platform upon which an individual becomes a member of a spiritual civilization.

The elements of one’s worldview, the beliefs about certain aspects of Reality, are one’s: epistemology: beliefs about the nature and sources of knowledge; metaphysics: beliefs about the ultimate nature of reality; cosmology: beliefs about the origins and nature of the universe, life, and especially man; teleology: beliefs about the meaning and purpose of the universe, its inanimate elements, and its inhabitants; theology: beliefs about the existence and nature of God; anthropology: beliefs about the nature and purpose of Man in general and, oneself in particular; and axiology: beliefs about the nature of value, what is good and bad, what is right and wrong. Worldview is the set of beliefs about fundamental aspects of Reality that ground and influence all our perceiving, thinking, knowing, and doing. Our worldview consists of our epistemology, our metaphysics, our cosmology, our teleology, our theology, our anthropology, and our axiology. Each of these subsets of our worldview is highly interrelated with and affects virtually all of the others (Funk, 2001).

Laszlo (2006) asserts that “in the third decade of the twenty-first century…the view of people is united in rejecting the mechanistic and fragmented concept of world and self that was the heritage of the Industrial Age. A new view is emerging: Humans are organic wholes within an organic biosphere in the embrace of an organically evolving universe.” (p.42-43). People existence and community development Is inherently connected with nature. People no longer believe they are free to manipulate the environment as they wish, in the hope that the consequences will take care of themselves or new technologies will take care of them. The mechanistic view of reality is transcended: the universe is not a passive backdrop to human actions, and individual actions have an immediate impact on the environment. Subtle ties bind human being to one another, to the biosphere and to the cosmos as a whole.

The Institute for the Future (2009) affirms Laszlo’s world view 2025. The report says that “A collapsing economy paves the way for discovering new kinds of value in all forms of interaction – from the microscopic scale of atoms to the macrocosms of human connections with each other and the planet they inhabit. Look at the coming decade from the perspective of millennia of change. Focus on the progress of the universe from the breakthrough structures of the atom to the living cell, the biota, the human body, the community of nations, the global economy. This is how the future will be new, by continuing the incredible experiment of reorganization for greater complexity, by creating the next astonishing structural forms in this long evolutionary path.”

Life Style 2025

The life style in 2025 announces” a renaissance of spirituality as well; women and men are rediscovering a higher or deeper dimension of their lives and existence”. (Laszlo, 2006). According to Laszlo, “people live simply than those who can afford luxurious life style in the late twentieth and early twenty-first century. These are not imposed by poverty and they are not the consequence of rules and legislations or high taxes. They are voluntary result of a different mindset. For me, a spiritual higher view on what life is all about. People realize that a high material standard of living does not necessarily mean high quality of life.”

They have a healthier lifestyle with nature and the environment better than the Industrial Age paragon of success, affluence and luxury. Individuals of 2025 are healthier and they live longer, but do not trigger growth of the population. Life ways are becoming ecologically sustainable. People are reoriented from aiming external growth to focusing on internal growth, shifting from aiming at conquest and consumption to wishing further the evolution of their thinking and behavior and the development of their communities.

Morality 2025

Laszlo (2006) believes that “Moral considerations inform the decisions people make in the private sphere as well as in the sphere of business and profession. In 2025 people agree that it is immoral to live in ways that reduce access for others in the resources required for a life l of basic dignity and wellbeing. The new morality is rooted in a universal principle: Live and act in a way that enables others to live as well. Live not necessarily in the same way but with a real possibility of satisfying basic needs and pursuing the ends of well-being and happiness.” (p. 45).

I would like to equate wellbeing of Laszlo with the wellbeing of Dyck and Neubert (2012). The various forms of wellbeing are: Physical: health, safety, Emotional: stress, positive feelings, work-life balance, Material: productivity, efficiency, profitability, Social: nurture community, social justice, help disadvantaged, Intellectual: coherent ideas, clear rationale, sound theory/logic, Aesthetic: beauty, elegant products/services, appealing workplace, Ecological: natural environment, sustainability, minimize pollution, Individual: self-interested self and stakeholders, and Spiritual: meditation, guided by spiritual truths/forces,

Decision-making and Security 2025

Laszlo (2006, p. 46) says, “The political world is globalized, but it is locally diverse; it is networked, but not monolithic. Sovereign nation states, has given way to a transnational system organized as a Chinese box of decision-making forums, with each forum having its own sphere of authority and responsibility.” This vision is shared by Jake Dunagan (2009) who says, “To survive the 21st century, humanity must undertake a massive, collective program to redesign our basic government structures at every level – based on the emerging technologically and cosmologically powerful understandings of life and the universe available.”

He continues, “The 2025 world is not a hierarchy but a “hererarchy”: a multilevel sequentially integrated structure of distributed decision=making. It is aimed at global coordination combined with regional, national, and local self-determination. The global level is the highest level of decision making, yet it is the lowest level at which peace and security can be ensured and global flow of goods, money and technology can be monitored. The regional level is indicated for decisions that coordinate the social and political aspirations and concerns of nations within the given regions Regional economic and social organizations provide the forum for the elected representatives of the member nations to consider and harmonized the interests and aspirations of their population. The national level Is appropriate for most of the functions traditionally performed by national government but without claiming absolute sovereignty for the nation-state and with due regard for decisions made in other forums in direct consultation with their inhabitants. The local level of decision making brings together the elected representatives of urban and rural communities. They coordinate the workings of the social and political towns, villages and rural regions in direct consultation with their inhabitants.”

Spiritual Consciousness 2025

Global consciousness for the good, truth and beauty of nature and humanity is a manifestation of a Spiritual Civilization. According to Laszlo (2006), “There are many things that differentiate people in the year 2025: religious beliefs, cultural heritage, economic and technological development, climate and environment. But a new consciousness enables them agree on principles that really matters:

1. That it is immoral for anyone to live in a way that distracts from the chances of others to achieve their life basic well-being and dignity.

2. It is better to exercise responsible trusteeship of human and natural sources of wealth on this planet than to exploit them for narrow and short-term benefit.

3. Nature is not a mechanism to be engineered and exploited but a living that brought us into being, and, given our awesome power of exploitation.

4. on and destruction is now entrusted to our care.

5.The way we solve problems and conflicts is not by attacking each other, but by understanding one another and cooperating in ways that serve the shared interest.

6.That the universal rights adopted by foresighted people in the 20th century – the right to freedom of expression, freedom to select our leaders, and freedom from torture and other arbitrary constraint on personal liberty as well as the right to food , shelter, education and employment – apply to everyone in the world, and deserve to be respected above and beyond consideration of personal, ethnic and national self-interest.” (Laszlo, 2006, p. 48).

Social Spiritual Civilization

Ecological Civilization is both a creative and innovative concept of China, which ultimately drives spiritual civilization. It is a creative product of human imagination because presents a new idea on how humans and nature should relate with each other. The need for harmonious relationship is for humans to treat nature with respect and judicious use of its abundant life-giving gifts to mankind.

It is innovative because it has an enhanced continuity for the 1987 Triple Bottom-line: People, Profit and Planet as critical sectors in sustainable development, where people (society), profit (economy) and planet (ecology) must relate harmoniously. Ecological Civilization in 2018 created a pyramid, where a new key player, Politics (governance) sit on top to manage Society (people), Economy (profit) and introduced a new element, Culture (belief). Culture is driven by one’s belief and attitude toward ecology (environment), economy (profit), an society (people). Culture hints at a higher level of human existence where, which Laszlo and other metaphysical gurus call consciousness. A new consciousness vis-à-vis ecological civilization calls for a human behavior based on spiritual values the guide and promote harmony with nature. Ecological civilization is leading mankind towards a Spiritual Civilization.

The term social spiritual civilization is way ahead of my pioneering concept of spiritual civilization. It appears that China is a leader in presenting new concepts to the Western world. Ecological Civilization was coined by President Xi Jinping, a concept that updated the 1987 Triple Bottom-line (People, Planet, Profit) paradigm for sustainable development.

The following is a narrative from Qi Zhenhai (2014). He said that the problem of building a socialist spiritual civilization is drawing the attention of the whole party and people across the country. In his “Speech Delivered at the Rally in Celebration of the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Founding of the People’s Republic of China,” Comrade Ye Jianying stated: “Simultaneous with our effort to build a high level of material civilization, we must raise the educational, scientific, and cultural levels as well as the health level of the whole nation, foster the lofty ideal of revolution, cultivate revolutionary ethics and customs, and develop a noble and colorful cultural life in an effort to build a high level of spiritual civilization.” Comrade Deng Xiaoping also pointed out that the endeavor to build a socialist spiritual civilization “refers not only to education, science, and culture, but also to communist ideology, ideals, faith, ethics, discipline, revolutionary stand and principles, and the comradeship between man and man”

Their expositions expound in depth the content and major significance of building a high level of socialist spiritual civilization. As architects of socialist spiritual civilization, teachers should be more enthusiastic than others in responding to the party Central Committee’s call to give wide publicity to and build conscientiously a high level of socialist spiritual civilization.

The Central Commission for Guiding Cultural and Ethical Progress is a commission of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) tasked with educational efforts to build a “spiritual civilization” (Jingshen Wenming) based on socialism and the goal to build a socialist harmonious society, according to the official CPC policy.(Shambaugh, 2007).

The Commission was established on April 21, 1997. As one of the most important ideological steering bodies of the CPC and the People’s Republic of China, it controls nationwide propaganda and ideological dissemination, overlapping another similar body, the Leading Group for Propaganda and Ideological Work. Both the Commission and the Leading Group are chaired by the Politburo Standing Committee responsible for propaganda, and overrule the CPC Propaganda Department.

Wu Yuanliang (2014) says that at the Party Twelfth National Congress, Comrade Hu Yaobang pointed out that simultaneous to the construction of a high level of material civilization efforts must also be made to build a high level of spiritual civilization. This is an issue related to the strategic policy of building socialism. The historical experience of socialism and realities in China today tell us that whether or not this policy can be adhered to will have a bearing on the rise or fall, success or failure, of socialism. Why should we raise the question to such a high plane? How can a high level of spiritual civilization be built simultaneously with a high level of material civilization? In advancing a coordinated development of the two, this article tries to inquire into the above problems and provide some theoretical explanations. A balanced approach to socio-economic-cultural emphasis in China’s development has entered a new phase of spiritual civilization.

Conclusion

1. The leap from Newtonian mechanistic physical science to quantum mechanics has pushed the idea of consciousness as a bridge to understanding Spiritual Civilization.

2. The end of the Great Period of Change (1987-2023) gives a glimpse of a New Enlightenment.

3. The Industrial Civilization and Global Civilization based on Newtonian science created havoc to the environment that triggered China’s Ecological Civilization.

4. A vision of a New Existence, after reaching Chaos Point presents an opportunity for a spiritual civilization

5. The experience of a 2025 consciousness is a foundation for an emergent spiritual civilization.

6. Western gurus that consider humans as spiritual beings are precursors of a Spiritual Civilization.

7. The existence of a Social Spiritual Civilization of China promotes human values without the religious flavor which the Western and Eastern religions impose on how to be part of a spiritual civilization.

References

Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J.A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty.

London: Profile Books.

Aumann, J. (1985). Christian spirituality in the catholic tradition. (Reprint). Broadway, OR: Wipf and Stock

Publishers.

Benefiel, M., Fry, L. and Geigle, D. (2014). Spirituality and Religion in the Workplace: History, Theory,

and Research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(3), 175-187.

Bennett, N. & G. James Lemoine, G.J. (2014) What VUCA Really Means for You. Harvard Business Review.

Byrne, R. (2206). The secret. NY: Atria Book.

Caluag, J. C. (1972). Teachers’ evaluation of the human evocative approach. De La Salle Manila, Grade School.

Caluag, J.C. (1900). Humanization and Christianization in the Five De La Salle Schools in the Philippines.

University of Sto. Tomas, Manila. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,

Caluag, J.C. (1972). Parent Survey on Attitudes and Values of their Children. Manila: De La Salle Grade School.

Caluag, J.C.(1970). Survey on Attitudes and Values of Grade VI Boys. Manila: De La Salle Grade School.

Chardin, T. de. (2021). In Spiritual Awareness / Awakening Quotes.

https://www.xavier.edu/jesuitresource/online-resources/quote-archive1/spiritual-awareness-quote

Craig, N. & Snook, S. (May 2014). From Purpose to Impact: Figure out your passion and put it to work.

Harvard Business Review

De Pape, B. (2014). The power of the heart: Finding your true purpose in life. London: Simon & Schuster

UK Ltd.

Dunagan, J. (2009). Post-Newtonian Governance. Ten-Year Forecast. Perspectives 2009 www.iftf.org.

Downey M. (1997). Understanding Christian spirituality. New York. Paulist Press.

Dyck, B. & Neubert, M.J. (2012). Management. Singapore: Cengage Learning.

Erikson E. H. (1968). Identity Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton Shea, 2004;

European SPES Institute. (n.d.). Our Mission: Spiritual-based Humanism.

http://www.eurospes.org/content/our-mission-spiritual-based-humanism#sthash.KsNeEtAu.dpuf

Fahlberg, L.L. & Fahlberg, A. (March-April1991). Exploring spirituality and consciousness with an expanded

science: beyond the ego with empiricism, phenomenology, and contemplation. American Journal of Health Promotion 5(4):273-81.

Funk, K. (2001). What is a Worldview? https://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~funkk/Personal/worldview.html

Friel, J. (n.d.). Reflection on Psycho-Spiritual Development, Daneo Human and Spiritual Development Services,

683, Crumlin Road, Belfast, North Ireland. http://daneoservices.weebly.com/refection-on-psycho-spiritual- development-john-friel-cp.html

Geigle, D. (December 2012). Workplace spirituality empirical research: a literature review. Business and

Management Review, 2(10), 14-27.

Hanson, A. (December 2019). Ecological Civilization in the People’s Republic of China: Values, Action, and

Future Needs ADB East Asia working paper series, No. 21.

Harari, Y.N. (2016). Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. London: Vikings.

Harari, Y.N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London: Jonathan Cape

Hicks, E. & Hicks, J. (2008). Ask and it is given: Learning to manifest the law of attraction. London: Hay House,

Inc.

Institute for the Future (2009). The Future is a Chance to be New. Ten-Year Forecast. Perspectives 2009

www.iftf.org.

Jingshen Wenming. (2007). In Shambaugh, D. (January 2007). China’s Propaganda System: Institutions, Processes

and Efficacy. (PDF). The China Journal. 57: 25–58.

Karakas, K. (2010). Spirituality and organization performance: a literature review. Journal of Business

Ethics, 94(1), 89-106Kilmann, R.H. (2001). Quantum organization: A new paradigm for achieving organizational success and personal meaning. Palo Alto, CA: Davis-Black Publishing.

Radjou & Prabhu, 2015

Kouzes, J.M. & Posner, B.C. (1995). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bas.

Lerner, A.R, (1972). The Economics and Politics of Consumer Sovereignty. American Economics Review 62:

256-66.

Marinoff, (2007). The middle way: Finding happiness in a world of extremes. NY: Sterling Publishing Co.,

Inc.

Mayer, J.D. (16 November 2009). Spiritual Intelligence or Spiritual Conscousness. International Journal

for Psychology of Region, 10(1) 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327582IJPR1001_5

Mitroff, & Denton, (1999). A spiritual audit of corporate America: A hard look at spirituality, religion and values at

the workplace. (1^st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

O’Murchu, D. (2004). Quantum theology: Spiritual implications of the new physics. Revised Ed.. NY: The

Crossroads Publishing Company

Dyer, Wayne. (n.d.). Wayne W. Dyer > Quotes > Quotable Quote. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/129575-we-

are-not-human-beings-in-search-of-a-spiritual. Quote Investigator (n.d.) You Are Not a Human Being Having a Spiritual Experience. You Are a Spiritual Being

Having a Human Experience. https://quoteinvestigator.com/2019/06/20/spiritual/ Retrieved: August 2, 2021.

Pande, M. & Vian, K. (2009). Civil Society: Networked Citizens. Ten-Year Forecast Perspective, Institute of the

Future. www.iftf.org.

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin? Wayne W. Dyer? Stephen R. Covey? Georges Gurdjieff? Anonymous?

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2019/06/20/spiritual/. Retrieved December 4, 2021.

Ray, J. (2006) in Byrne, R. (2206). The secret. NY: Atria Book.

Regan, S. (2020). Your Guide To The 7 Chakra Colors & How To Use Them. mbgmindfjulness.

https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/7-chakra-colors-what-they-mean-and-why-they-matter

Shambaugh, D. (January 2007). China’s Propaganda System: Institutions, Processes and Efficacy. (PDF). The China

Journal. 57: 25–58.

Tolle, E. (2005). A new earth: Awakening your life’s purpose. USA: Dutton/Penguin Group.

Ulrich, D. & Ulrich, W. (2010). The why of work. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Van Kaam, A. (1964). Religion and spirituality. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Incorporated, 42.

Warren, R. (2002). The purpose driven life: What on earth am I here for? Michigan: Zondervan

Walsch, D. (July 22, 2021). Facebook post, M.P. Hudtohan. youtube.com The Apocalypse of Belief – Healing Our

Culture http://www.brucelipton.comHumans evolved from within a “Garden,”.

Wu Yuanliang.(2014). On the Coordinated Development of Spiritual and Material Civilizations

https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-146715033.

Xu Dashen. (1994). Records of the People’s Republic of China (《中华人民共和国实录》), China: Jilin

People’s Publishing House.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Personal Perfection and Self-Innovation – A Quantum Perspective. Benita & Catalino Yap Foundation (BCYF)

Written By: SuperAdmin - Jun.12,2023

Certifcate of Appreciation given by Tony Yap, Founder and Chair of Benita & Catalino Yap Foundation (BCYF) for delivering and Inspiratation Talk: Personal Perfection and Self-Innovation at Club Filipino Feb. 24, 2023. Thank you Tony; Thank you, BCYF. Congratulatins to the Young Innovators.

BCYF Innovation Awards Feb. 24, 2023. Club Filipino. I delivered an inspirational Talk: Personal Perfection and Self-Innovation – A Quantum Perspective. I thank Tony Yap, fournder and chair of Benita & Catalino Yap Foundation for the invite. Animo.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

De La Salle Study Center, Sta. Fe, New Mexico, USA

Written By: SuperAdmin - Jun.12,2023

1973, Fifty years ago, I was at the De La Salle Study Center, Sta. Fe, New Mexico, USA for a renewal program for 3 months. Class picture global Brothers in attendance. My first snow, I went crazy feeling and touching the halo-halolike stuff. We had fun doing a Halloween Party. Of course, I went native with improvised Igorot custume. Where did the 50 years go…such is eternity: the present and the past merging right now, right here. Thank you, De La Salle Brothers. Thank you, Br. Benildo Feliciano FSC who sent me to Sangre and allowed a three month tour of Europe.